Next: Electromagnetic Radiation
Up: Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory
Previous: Perturbation Expansion
Consider a (Hermitian) perturbation which oscillates sinusoidally
in time. This is usually termed a harmonic perturbation. Such
a perturbation takes the form
|
(1067) |
where is, in general, a function of position, momentum, and spin operators.
It follows from Eqs. (1064) and (1067) that, to first-order,
|
(1068) |
where
Integration with respect to yields
where
|
(1072) |
Figure 25:
The functions (dashed curve) and
(solid curve). The vertical dotted lines denote
the region .
|
Now, the function takes its largest values when
, and is fairly negligible when (see Fig. 25). Thus, the first and second terms
on the right-hand side of Eq. (1071) are only
non-negligible when
|
(1073) |
and
|
(1074) |
respectively.
Clearly, as increases, the ranges in over which these two
terms are non-negligible gradually shrink in size.
Eventually, when
, these two ranges become strongly non-overlapping.
Hence, in this limit,
yields
|
(1075) |
Now, the function
is very strongly peaked at ,
and is completely negligible for
(see Fig. 25). It follows that the above expression exhibits a
resonant response to the applied perturbation at the frequencies
. Moreover,
the widths of these resonances decease linearly as time increases. At each
of the resonances (i.e., at
), the transition
probability
varies as [since
]. This behaviour
is entirely consistent with our earlier result (1044), for the two-state
system, in the limit
(recall that our perturbative
solution is only valid as long as
).
The resonance at
corresponds to
|
(1076) |
This implies that the system loses energy to the
perturbing field, whilst making a transition to a final state whose
energy is less than the initial state by . This process is
known as stimulated emission. The resonance at
corresponds to
|
(1077) |
This implies that the system gains energy from the
perturbing field, whilst making a transition to a final state whose
energy is greater than that of the initial state by . This
process is known as absorption.
Stimulated emission and absorption are mutually exclusive processes, since the
first requires , whereas the second requires . Hence, we can write the transition probabilities for
both processes separately. Thus, from (1075), the
transition probability for stimulated emission is
|
(1078) |
where we have made use of the facts that
,
and
. Likewise, the transition probability
for absorption is
|
(1079) |
Next: Electromagnetic Radiation
Up: Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory
Previous: Perturbation Expansion
Richard Fitzpatrick
2010-07-20