Next: Square Potential Well
Up: One-Dimensional Potentials
Previous: Cold Emission
Many types of heavy atomic nucleus spontaneously decay to produce daughter nucleii
via the emission of -particles (i.e., helium nucleii) of some characteristic energy.
This process is know as
-decay. Let us investigate the -decay of a particular type of atomic nucleus of radius , charge-number ,
and mass-number . Such a nucleus thus decays to produce a daughter
nucleus of charge-number and mass-number ,
and an -particle of charge-number and mass-number
. Let the characteristic energy of the -particle
be . Incidentally, nuclear radii
are found to satisfy the empirical formula
|
(353) |
for .
In 1928, George Gamov proposed a very successful theory of -decay,
according to which the -particle moves freely inside the nucleus, and is emitted after tunneling through the
potential barrier between itself and the daughter nucleus. In other words,
the -particle, whose energy is , is trapped in a potential well of radius by the
potential barrier
|
(354) |
for .
Making use of the WKB approximation (and neglecting the fact
that is a radial, rather than a Cartesian, coordinate), the probability
of the -particle tunneling through the barrier is
|
(355) |
where and
. Here,
is the -particle mass. The above expression
reduces to
|
(356) |
where
|
(357) |
is a dimensionless constant, and
|
(358) |
is the characteristic energy the -particle would need in order to escape
from the nucleus without tunneling. Of course, .
It is easily demonstrated that
|
(359) |
when .
Hence.
|
(360) |
Now, the -particle moves inside the nucleus with the characteristic
velocity
. It follows that the particle bounces backward
and forward within the nucleus at the frequency
, giving
|
(361) |
for a 1 MeV -particle trapped inside a typical heavy nucleus of radius m.
Thus, the -particle effectively attempts to tunnel through the potential
barrier times a second. If each of these attempts has a probability
of succeeding, then the probability of decay per unit time
is . Hence, if there are undecayed nuclii at time then
there are only at time , where
|
(362) |
This expression can be integrated to give
|
(363) |
Now, the half-life, , is defined as the time which must elapse
in order for half of the nuclii originally present to decay. It follows from
the above formula that
|
(364) |
Note that the half-life is independent of .
Finally, making use of the above results, we obtain
|
(365) |
where
Figure 15:
The experimentally determined half-life, , of various atomic nucleii which decay via emission versus the best-fit theoretical half-life
. Both half-lives are measured in years. Here, , where is the charge number of the nucleus, and the characteristic energy of the emitted -particle in MeV. In
order of increasing half-life, the points correspond to the
following nucleii: Rn 215, Po 214, Po 216, Po 197, Fm 250, Ac 225, U 230, U 232, U 234, Gd 150, U 236, U 238, Pt 190, Gd 152, Nd 144. Data obtained from IAEA Nuclear Data Centre.
|
The half-life, , the daughter charge-number, , and
the -particle energy, , for atomic nucleii which undergo -decay
are indeed found to satisfy a relationship of the form (365). The
best fit to the data (see Fig. 15) is obtained using
Note that these values are remarkably similar to those calculated above.
Next: Square Potential Well
Up: One-Dimensional Potentials
Previous: Cold Emission
Richard Fitzpatrick
2010-07-20