Next: WKB Approximation
Up: One-Dimensional Potentials
Previous: Infinite Potential Well
Square Potential Barrier
Consider a particle of mass and energy interacting with the
simple square potential barrier
|
(313) |
where . In the regions to the left and to the right of the
barrier, satisfies
|
(314) |
where is given by Eq. (305).
Let us adopt the following solution
of the above equation to the left of the barrier (i.e., ):
|
(315) |
This solution consists of a plane wave of unit amplitude traveling to
the right [since the time-dependent wavefunction is multiplied by
, where
], and a plane wave of complex amplitude traveling to
the left. We interpret the first plane wave as an incoming particle (or, rather, a stream of incoming particles), and
the second as a particle (or stream of particles) reflected by the potential barrier. Hence, is
the probability of reflection. This can be seen by calculating the
probability current (155) in the region , which takes the form
|
(316) |
where
is the classical particle velocity.
Let us adopt the following solution to Eq. (314) to the right
of the barrier (i.e. ):
|
(317) |
This solution consists of a plane wave of complex amplitude
traveling to the right. We interpret this as a particle (or stream of particles) transmitted through
the barrier. Hence, is the probability of transmission.
The probability current in the region takes the form
|
(318) |
Now, according to Eq. (171), in a stationary state (i.e.,
), the probability current is a spatial constant
(i.e.,
). Hence, we must have , or
|
(319) |
In other words, the probabilities of reflection and transmission sum to
unity, as must be the case, since reflection and transmission are the only possible outcomes for a
particle incident on the barrier.
Inside the barrier (i.e.,
), satisfies
|
(320) |
where
|
(321) |
Let us, first of all, consider the case where . In this case, the general
solution to Eq. (320) inside the barrier takes the
form
|
(322) |
where
.
Now, the boundary conditions at the edges of the barrier (i.e., at
and ) are that and are both
continuous. These boundary conditions ensure that the probability current
(155) remains finite and continuous across the edges of the boundary, as must be the
case if it is to be a spatial constant.
Continuity of and at the left edge of
the barrier (i.e., ) yields
Likewise, continuity of and at the right edge of
the barrier (i.e., ) gives
After considerable algebra, the above four equations yield
|
(327) |
and
|
(328) |
Note that the above two expression satisfy the constraint (319).
It is instructive to compare the quantum mechanical probabilities
of reflection and transmission--(327) and (328), respectively--with those derived from classical physics. Now, according
to classical physics, if a particle of energy is incident on
a potential barrier of height then the particle slows down
as it passes through the barrier, but is otherwise unaffected.
In other words, the classical probability of reflection is
zero, and the classical probability of transmission is unity.
Figure 10:
Transmission (solid-curve) and reflection (dashed-curve) probabilities for a square potential barrier of width
, where is the free-space de Broglie wavelength, as a function
of the ratio of the height of the barrier, , to the
energy, , of the incident particle.
|
Figure 11:
Transmission (solid-curve) and reflection (dashed-curve) probabilities for a particle of energy incident on a square potential barrier of height , as a function
of the ratio of the width of the barrier, , to the free-space de Broglie
wavelength, .
|
The reflection and transmission probabilities obtained from Eqs. (327) and (328), respectively, are plotted in Figs. 10 and
11. It can be seen, from Fig. 10, that the classical
result, and , is obtained in the limit where the height of the barrier
is relatively small (i.e., ). However, when is
of order , there is a substantial probability that the incident particle
will be reflected by the barrier. According to classical physics, reflection is impossible when .
It can also be seen, from Fig. 11,
that at certain barrier widths the probability of reflection goes to zero. It turns out that this is true irrespective of the energy of the incident particle.
It is evident, from Eq. (327), that these special barrier widths
correspond to
|
(329) |
where
. In other words, the special barriers widths are
integer multiples of half the de Broglie wavelength of the particle inside the
barrier. There is no reflection at the special barrier widths because, at these
widths,
the backward traveling wave reflected from the left edge of the barrier
interferes destructively with the similar wave reflected from the right
edge of the barrier to give zero net reflected wave.
Let us, now, consider the case . In this case, the general
solution to Eq. (320) inside the barrier takes the
form
|
(330) |
where
.
Continuity of and at the left edge of
the barrier (i.e., ) yields
Likewise, continuity of and at the right edge of
the barrier (i.e., ) gives
After considerable algebra, the above four equations yield
|
(335) |
and
|
(336) |
These expressions can also be obtained from Eqs. (327) and
(328) by making the substitution
.
Note that Eqs. (335) and (336) satisfy the constraint (319).
It is again instructive to compare the quantum mechanical probabilities
of reflection and transmission--(335) and (336), respectively--with those derived from classical physics. Now, according
to classical physics, if a particle of energy is incident on
a potential barrier of height then the particle is reflected.
In other words, the classical probability of reflection is
unity, and the classical probability of transmission is zero.
Figure 12:
Transmission (solid-curve) and reflection (dashed-curve) probabilities for a square potential barrier of width
, where is the free-space de Broglie wavelength, as a function
of the ratio of the energy, , of the incoming particle to the
height, , of the barrier.
|
Figure 13:
Transmission (solid-curve) and reflection (dashed-curve) probabilities for a particle of energy incident on a square potential barrier of height
, as a function
of the ratio of the width of the barrier, , to the free-space de Broglie
wavelength, .
|
The reflection and transmission probabilities obtained from Eqs. (335) and (336), respectively, are plotted in Figs. 12 and
13. It can be seen, from Fig. 12, that the classical
result, and , is obtained for relatively
thin barriers (i.e., ) in the limit where the height of the barrier
is relatively large (i.e., ). However, when is
of order , there is a substantial probability that the incident particle
will be transmitted by the barrier. According to classical physics, transmission is impossible when .
It can also be seen, from
Fig. 13, that the transmission probability decays exponentially
as the width of the barrier increases. Nevertheless, even for very
wide barriers (i.e., ), there is a small but finite
probability that a particle incident on the barrier will be
transmitted. This phenomenon, which is inexplicable within
the context of classical physics, is called tunneling.
Next: WKB Approximation
Up: One-Dimensional Potentials
Previous: Infinite Potential Well
Richard Fitzpatrick
2010-07-20